No view can be completely unbiased. Newspapers, TV stations, books, verbal accounts, and articles are all biased. Ones views and opinions: biased. My angsty teen writing-- yup, biased.
So calling pictures biased, and taking it to the point of calling them inaccurate, might not be inaccurate after all.
An example is this picture. This is not me, nor of anyone I know (I googled tree skiing), yet I do not find any inaccuracies of it. The way the photographer took the picture made the snow look untracked, a wilderness image appear as the background, and a modern aggressive skier as the focus. This shot was set up and undoubtedly edited. If someone simply took out a point-and-shoot camera and took a picture of a skier it would not look like this; this picture is inaccurate.
But it is not. This may not be what one would see if they appeared in this situation, but this is how they would feel. An image like this evoked emotions that one in the situation of the skier would be experiencing. Photographic accuracy goes far beyond the simple contents of an image. Pictures can be an accurate representation of the human experience without being an accurate representation of the world.